Site Construction Challenges Overcome by the GC/CM Team
The project is located on Oak Harbor, which contains federally listed fish species, including Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout, Pacific eulachon, and green sturgeon, as well as bull trout and green sturgeon critical habitat. Throughout the project’s planning and construction phases, environmental considerations were accounted for and are described below.
The GC/CM construction team addressed numerous construction challenges resulting from the required treatment facilities and selected project location. From constructing the outfall in Oak Harbor to opening the effluent valve to discharge treated water, the GC/CM team rose to every challenge throughout construction to deliver the Oak Harbor Clean Water Facility on time and on budget.
In-Water Work
The initial work performed on-site was retiring and replacing the existing outfall line to the bay. Replacing the outfall line posed unique challenges from a construction and management perspective. Variable tides, based on the time of day and month, forced work on the tide flats during low tides, and off a barge during high tides once work progressed into deeper waters. Hoffman performed this work while always being conscientious of the surrounding public and environmental protection. Large, wood crane mats were used to move heavy civil equipment on the tide flats while reducing the environmental impact of the work.
The challenges of this portion of work extended to safety and extensive pretask planning concerning divers and workers. Dives were planned and walked through weeks in advance and revisited before the work was performed to ensure a safe and efficient installation.
Groundwater Management
The location of this project and proximity to Oak Harbor posed significant concerns about groundwater prior to mass excavation. The Clean Water Facility is located approximately 100 yards from the shores of the bay, with groundwater found at Elevation 7.0 and excavation extending to Elevation -13.5. To combat the groundwater, the project employed locking sheet piles driven into glacial till to form a cofferdam. The quality of the cofferdam installation resulted in relatively minimal groundwater infiltration that was readily dealt with and treated on-site.
Mass Excavation
Over 50,000 cubic yards of soil was excavated from the newly formed cofferdam. Looking forward at upcoming work in the adjacent Windjammer Park, the team decided early on to keep this material on-site to avoid the added costs of haul-off and new import when the time came. Fortunately, an expansive laydown yard had available space to stockpile this material. During the Windjammer Park work, all this material was used to recontour the park and raise the overall elevation throughout to alleviate flooding.
Crane Placement
During construction, multiple buildings spread across the two+ acre site had to be accessed. By correctly positioning a tower crane, the project was able use one large tower crane instead of multiple cranes. The crane was strategically located so it would be of use throughout the project while not impeding the construction progress. In addition, the crane had to be placed within the confines of the cofferdam due to ground loading restrictions.
To allow for timely backfill of the structure inside the cofferdam, Hoffman used a 20-foot concrete retaining wall to isolate the crane from the surrounding backfill. The Oak Harbor Clean Water Facility is located adjacent to SE City Beach Street, which was lined with above-ground power/communication lines on utility poles. With the larger crane radius, Hoffman decided to move these utilities underground to eliminate any potential hazard of crane contact and to leave the project with a “cleaner” look upon completion.
Jobsite Location
Transporting materials and recruiting qualified workers to Oak Harbor’s remote location posed many challenges. There are only two ways on or off the island: one is taking the Mukilteo/Clinton ferry and the other is driving across the narrow Deception Pass bridge. One challenge was bringing large loads (e.g., a tower crane) over the bridge. This required coordinating with the Department of Transportation and bringing equipment over the bridge during select hours that correlated with low traffic times. Regarding the workforce, the project was fortunate to be able to use as many local contractors and local workers as feasible.